Discussion:
[PVE-User] Virtio-nic or other
Gilberto Nunes
2018-09-20 16:22:48 UTC
Permalink
HI there

PVE 5.2
CentOS guest with kernel 2.6.32

With is safer: virtio or realtek?

I was using e1000 but get bug with that kernel...
Virtio-nic has bug in this kernel too?

Thanks a lot
---
Gilberto Nunes Ferreira

(47) 3025-5907
(47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram

Skype: gilberto.nunes36
Thomas Lamprecht
2018-09-21 05:27:49 UTC
Permalink
Hi,
Post by Gilberto Nunes
HI there
PVE 5.2
CentOS guest with kernel 2.6.32
With is safer: virtio or realtek?
hard to say, but 2.6.32 has virtio-net support, and it's normally
faster, so I'd start there. If you still run into problems you
can always try realtek too. Normally CentOS ports a lot of fixes
back to their dusty old kernel, so virtio-net should really be worth
a shot.
Post by Gilberto Nunes
I was using e1000 but get bug with that kernel...
Virtio-nic has bug in this kernel too?
Would help to specify which bug exactly :)

cheers,
Thomas
Gilberto Nunes
2018-09-21 10:53:06 UTC
Permalink
Hi

In the occasion, I het

eth0: Adapter Reset when attempt to migrate from node to other.


But now I run VM with rtl driver... I feel more confortable...

Thanks a lot

---
Gilberto Nunes Ferreira

(47) 3025-5907
(47) 99676-7530 - Whatsapp / Telegram

Skype: gilberto.nunes36
Post by Thomas Lamprecht
Hi,
Post by Gilberto Nunes
HI there
PVE 5.2
CentOS guest with kernel 2.6.32
With is safer: virtio or realtek?
hard to say, but 2.6.32 has virtio-net support, and it's normally
faster, so I'd start there. If you still run into problems you
can always try realtek too. Normally CentOS ports a lot of fixes
back to their dusty old kernel, so virtio-net should really be worth
a shot.
Post by Gilberto Nunes
I was using e1000 but get bug with that kernel...
Virtio-nic has bug in this kernel too?
Would help to specify which bug exactly :)
cheers,
Thomas
Loading...